Formation of Gas Hydrates
Types of Hydrate Inhibitors
There are primarily three types used in oil and gas industry - thermodynamic inhibitors, low dosage Hydrate Inhibitors and kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHI). Thermodynamic inhibitors, also known as anti-freeze inhibitors, work by depressing the temperature and pressure conditions needed for hydrate formation. Commonly used thermodynamic inhibitors are methanol, ethylene glycol and salt solutions. LDHI are polymer based additive that are injected in extremely low dosages, typically less than 100ppm, to prevent hydrate formation. KHI alter the hydrate formation mechanism by slowing down the nucleation and growth rates of hydrates when injected at low concentrations.
Mechanism of Action of Hydrate Inhibitors
The mechanism of hydrate prevention differs between different classes of inhibitors. Thermodynamic inhibitors mitigate hydrates by lowering the hydrate equilibrium temperature and pressure conditions required for hydrate formation through their interaction with water. LDHI work by adsorbing onto hydrate crystal surfaces, slowing down or stopping further crystal growth. KHI operate through similar adsorption mechanism while also altering hydrate crystal structures formed. They interact reversibly with water and gas molecules preventing formation of lattice cages necessary for hydrate crystal nucleation and growth. Some KHI have polyvinylpyrrolidone side chains that strongly bind with water changing its hydrogen bonding ability.
Application in Pipelines and Production Facilities
Hydrate inhibitors find critical application in subsea oil and gas pipelines, risers, manifolds, wellheads, separators, heater treaters and other process equipment where hydrates pose major blockage risk due to favorable conditions of low temperature and high pressure. In pipelines, continuous injection of thermodynamic or kinetic inhibitors maintains a stable hydrate inhibition window even as temperature fluctuates along the route. At offshore platforms, inhibitors help ensure continuous hydrocarbon processing and flow assurance by preventing hydrate plugging. They allow for lower cost insulation on vessels as insulation requirements can be reduced. Subsea tie-backs between distant fields also rely majorly on inhibitors to prevent restriction of flow due to hydrates.
Synergy with Thermal Insulation
Though thermodynamic inhibitors alone can effectively prevent hydrate formation, their quantities required increase costs drastically, especially for deepwater applications. Combining thermodynamic inhibitors with thermal insulation provides synergistic advantages. Lower insulation ratings can be used when inhibitors are present because hydrate formation temperature is depressed. This helps contain project capital and operating costs. Less inhibitor consumption also leads to opex savings and reduced environmental footprint. Computational modeling tools are leveraged to precisely quantify heat transfer and optimize inhibitor dosage-insulation thickness combinations as per flow assurance needs.
Testing and Qualification Protocols
Rigorous testing is essential to prove effectiveness and compatibility of new hydrate inhibitors prior to field deployment. Laboratory experiments cover characteristic like inhibition onset time, continued protection duration, residual inhibition on flow resumption and tolerance to variations in process conditions. Standardized methods specified by organizations like NACE and ISO involve use of high pressure cells to monitor hydrate formation under controlled temperature sweep protocols. Real time analysis techniques like Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction are employed for hydrate identification. Compatibility with hydrocarbons, thermodynamic Phase behavior, and toxicity properties are also evaluated to avoid any potential issues. Field trials help validate laboratory results under actual field conditions.
Get More Insights On, Hydrate Inhibitors
Comments
0 comment