Pakistan Diplomatic Gains and Modi’s Critics: A Tale of Two Narratives

In the ever-evolving landscape of South Asian geopolitics, Pakistan’s recent diplomatic activities have been gaining traction on the global stage. While India, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, faces internal and external criticism for its handling of foreign affairs and domestic politics, Pakistan is being increasingly seen as a country leveraging diplomacy to reshape its global image. The contrasting narratives between Islamabad’s engagement strategy and the rising voices of dissent in India highlight a pivotal moment in regional dynamics.

Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Momentum

Over the last few years, Pakistan has strategically focused on diplomatic outreach, regional cooperation, and multilateral engagement. Under the leadership of successive foreign ministers and diplomatic envoys, Islamabad has repositioned itself as a constructive player in global affairs—especially after the tumultuous period of geopolitical isolation following incidents such as the 2019 Pulwama-Balakot crisis.

In forums such as the United Nations, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Pakistan has actively raised its concerns on Kashmir, Islamophobia, and regional stability. Its role in facilitating the Afghan peace process, hosting international summits, and building stronger ties with nations like China, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia has allowed Pakistan to move away from a purely security-centric identity toward one of a proactive regional stakeholder.

Recently, Pakistani officials have held high-level bilateral meetings with leaders from more than 50 countries, engaging in discussions that extend beyond defense and security—towards trade, climate change, education, and technology. The country’s economic corridor with China (CPEC) remains a centerpiece of its strategic relevance, providing not just economic benefits but also geopolitical leverage in the wider Indo-Pacific theater.

India Under Modi: Rising Dissent and Diplomatic Isolation?

While Pakistan appears to be making inroads diplomatically, India’s foreign policy under Modi is facing criticism from opposition leaders, international observers, and civil society. Critics argue that Modi’s administration has become too focused on nationalist narratives at the expense of strategic diplomacy. A key point of contention has been the government's rigid stance on Pakistan, the refusal to reengage in constructive dialogue, and the increasing militarization of diplomacy.

One of the most vocal criticisms came in response to Modi’s remarks and policies that have drawn India into verbal and strategic conflict with not only Pakistan but also China, Canada, and some Western nations. The revocation of Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was met with global concern—even as India insisted it was an internal matter. Several international human rights organizations and political voices continue to raise alarms over the treatment of minorities and press freedom under Modi’s government.

The Indian opposition has seized on these developments to question the Modi government’s foreign policy coherence. “Where is your foreign policy while Pakistan is gathering diplomatic successes globally?” is a sentiment echoed in Indian political circles. Some opposition figures argue that the BJP government is more interested in optics and aggressive posturing than in meaningful diplomatic engagement.

The Symbolism of Contrast

What makes this juxtaposition particularly significant is not just the difference in global perception, but the strategic implications. Pakistan, which has historically struggled with image issues tied to terrorism and political instability, is now actively reframing its narrative. By contrast, India—long considered the subcontinent’s stable democracy and economic powerhouse—is increasingly criticized for rising authoritarianism, hyper-nationalism, and diplomatic belligerence.

This symbolic shift is evident in how global forums respond to both nations. While India still maintains strong relations with the United States, France, and Japan, its global image has been dented by its handling of internal dissent, religious intolerance, and border conflicts. Meanwhile, Pakistan’s quieter but consistent diplomatic engagement is earning it new respect among Muslim nations, African countries, and even segments of the Western policy community.

Challenges Ahead

That said, Pakistan’s journey is not without challenges. The country continues to face economic difficulties, IMF negotiations, and a fragile political environment at home. Its diplomatic strategy will only be effective if it is supported by sustainable governance, economic reforms, and internal stability.

Likewise, India remains a formidable regional and global player, with deep-rooted alliances and economic strength. However, if Modi’s government fails to heed growing domestic and international concerns, it risks alienating both its neighbors and global partners.

Conclusion

As Pakistan capitalizes on its diplomatic momentum, and India grapples with internal and external criticism of its foreign policy, the strategic landscape of South Asia is undergoing a quiet transformation. For Pakistan, this could be an opportunity to cement its image as a responsible international actor. For India, it might be a time for introspection.

The world is watching—and increasingly, it is asking tough questions not just about power, but about principles, diplomacy, and the art of global engagement.

Reference:   پاکستان عالمی سطح پر کامیابیاں سمیٹ رہا، آپ کی خارجہ پالیسی کہاں ہے؟ بھارت میں مودی پر تنقید