Why Education Is Not The Learning Of Facts?
Why Education Is Not The Learning Of Facts?
Education is a sword that protects against illiteracy, a weapon for success, and a force for leadership. The mind begins to work at birth, but with time it begins to think and the more we learn through education and experiences, the more it begins to think about improving the present and the future.

What Is The Difference Between Education And The Acquisition Of Facts?

The purpose of education is to bring light into the darkness. By following this light, you will follow the right path. An individual's will determines whether he or she controls his or her emotions and thinks in the right or wrong way. In order to bring happiness to one's own life and to that of one's family and community, an educated person must follow a positive decision. Similar to these, going through the wrong path even with education can lead to disasters that can ruin not just his own life, but also the lives of his family and even societies.

The Idea Of Getting An Education And Using Our Minds To Think Is Good,

But what will be the outcome of this thinking? Education does not make the person happier, it is their personal choice, which is why I will say that education wakes up the mind to go for happiness through a straight path through hard work, sincerity, God-fearing, respect, and learning. Through negative thinking, one makes an individual even worse than an animal by following a shortcut to crimes, difficulties, sins, and disasters. However, it is not education that forces him to think in this way, but his choice, a wrong choice, which is not the true meaning of education.

Once I Had A Unique Question About Education,

Namely why education is not just about learning facts? However, gathering information on this different topic on the internet was difficult. Later on, I was able to gather information using the content written by Law Assignment Writers.

There is no point in accumulating miscellaneous information if the learner cannot integrate it and use it intelligently. According to Einstein, the following remarks were made: In education, minds are trained to think, not to learn facts. Every developed country has ensured that its native language/mother tongue is the medium of instruction in its educational system. Accepting the truth and moving forward is the only way to move forward.

It Seems That Albert Einstein Quoted A Line Recently. Here's How It Goes:

My initial reaction was that this line was too generic, but after thinking about it and digging deeper, it started to make more sense. The goal of getting marks, securing good grades, and learning more has been drilled into us since childhood. Extempore speeches, debates, quizzes, recitations and quizzes are some of the extracurricular activities we participate in, and when we win a prize, we are elated.

We've Been Memorizing Facts All Through Childhood, Hasn't It?

Those extra-curricular activities actually involve what? Because the child has learnt all the facts, he or she is just using their oratory skills, not their mental abilities. It is just a matter of training our mouths to speak what they have learned (in a broader sense, it is what they have taught us).

My belief is that the education system should place a greater emphasis on training the mind to think rather than merely teaching facts. We immediately focus our attention on memorizing every little detail of chapters 5 and 6 the moment the teacher says "Exam is coming, we will have questions from these chapters", immediately our minds are focused on getting the maximum marks.

If Students Were Trained, Instead Of Mugging Up, What Would Happen?

Students were hardly affected by smart education as it came and went. Byjus, Embibe, MertiNation, etc. are new-age startups that innovate learning methods in newer ways. Do we ensure that students are learning, not just learning, by training their minds? The question is a big one right now.

Children's Learning Is Undermined By Early Instruction:

Does it make more sense to teach a child how to use a particular object, or to let them explore it without direct guidance? According to Alison Gopnik's piece on Slate.com, some shocking statistics have been uncovered.

The children who had a teacher instruct them on how a toy worked did not explore it beyond the directions given by the adult after they received a toy that did multiple things like a squeak, play music, etc. Students who were given the toy without instructions, however, discovered several different mechanisms that weren't immediately apparent how it worked.

Children's natural curiosity to discover how the world works is stunted by early academic learning based on directive instruction.

Children Gain Little Or No Knowledge From Practical Science Work:

Many science curricula include practical work or labs designed to enrich the learning of science concepts found in textbooks. It turns out, however, that practical work isn't always as effective as it appears on the surface, according to Justin Dillon from King's College in London. It's common for labs to be designed in such a way that students follow instructions without exercising critical thinking skills.

Students can spend more time reflecting on important concepts without spending time and money on a poorly designed lab by using other methods, such as technology. The science curriculum does need to be improved in some way, but traditional lab work may no longer be the solution. The need for more research is evident, but assuming that a class has a hands-on experiment means they are learning crucial skills is incorrect.

disclaimer

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://www.timessquarereporter.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!

Facebook Conversations